Browse Source

- prefer udhcpc to pump

- update TODO

r6970
master
Gaudenz Steinlin 19 years ago
parent
commit
d28dcd9dbb
  1. 7
      TODO
  2. 4
      debian/changelog
  3. 4
      netcfg-common.c

7
TODO

@ -1,7 +1,3 @@
* Nameserver and domain are in the common configuration? Should they be?
* we should send a dhcp hostname
* put in checks so the user can't enter data that is clearly invalid (perhaps
this will be done through debconf.
@ -13,5 +9,4 @@
* Make netcfg-static smarter about default values, e.g. call ifconfig and
parse.
* Group as many questions together as possible (see #186029). Is the "Is this
correct" question really necessary? Backup support is probably better!
* Ask for a hostname if the DHCP server does not provide one.

4
debian/changelog

@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ netcfg (0.37) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Thiemo Seufer
- Code cleanup.
* Gaudenz Steinlin
- prefer udhcpc to pump
-- Thiemo Seufer <seufer@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:38:05 +0100
-- Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@soziologie.ch> Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:51:10 +0100
netcfg (0.36) unstable; urgency=low

4
netcfg-common.c

@ -896,10 +896,10 @@ int netcfg_activate_dhcp(struct debconfclient *client)
if (stat("/sbin/dhclient", &stat_buf) == 0)
dhcp_client = DHCLIENT;
else if (stat("/sbin/pump", &stat_buf) == 0)
dhcp_client = PUMP;
else if (stat("/sbin/udhcpc", &stat_buf) == 0)
dhcp_client = UDHCPC;
else if (stat("/sbin/pump", &stat_buf) == 0)
dhcp_client = PUMP;
else {
debconf_input(client, "critical", "netcfg/no_dhcp_client");
debconf_go(client);

Loading…
Cancel
Save